Much Ado About Nothing (1974) this paper argues a particular point of view or idea
Much Ado About Nothing (1974) this paper argues a particular point of view or idea (2 full pages). They should be double-spaced typed pages. Both of these plays can be watched via streaming video through the Holman Library search engine. The expectation is that they will be "thesis" papers. Think of yourselves as theatre critics and are either trying to convince me to see the production or avoid it.
A "thesis" paper argues a particular point of view or idea (it makes a case for it while considering possible objections). It is conceptual in structure and uses clear proof, interpretations and/or judgments to make its case. It is an argumentative paper. You must make a judgment or state a particular point of view and then defend it. Your focus can be as broad as you like or as narrowly focused as you like. Whatever impressions you took away from viewing the play is a good beginning place. Maybe a particular performance, or the direction, or the costume design struck you. That is the place you begin. IMPORTANT: You are not reviewing the play as literature, you are reviewing the production you saw as theatre. Please don't analyze the script too much, I'm far more interested in your opinions about the production you saw based on the choices the artists made to bring it to pass.
The following guidelines apply generally to the paper. However, you may find that you have to adapt them slightly to conform to the requirements of the question you are addressing.
1. Start with an idea that grabs the reader's attention, not the thesis or name of the artist or artwork. Bring this idea back at the end of the paper to round it out.
2. State your thesis and sketch how you intend to support it in an introductory paragraph. The thesis will indicate what you are trying to show in the discussion that follows. This should be brief and to the point.
3. Maintain your focus, and try to stick to a single point. Probably one of the biggest failings of most papers is their failure to concentrate on and develop a well-focused argument. It is far better to examine a small number of issues in detail than a long list that is treated superficially.
4. Bring your paper to a well-defined close. In the final two paragraphs, you should state what you believe that you have established in the paper, reiterate the most important points, and generally tie the paper together. Bring back the idea from the beginning and develop it a bit further. This gives a satisfying conclusion.
Answer preview for Much Ado About Nothing (1974) this paper argues a particular point of view or idea
Access the full answer containing 570 words by clicking the below purchase button.